Comparison of Investment Options – Super vs Managed Funds vs Insurance Bonds

Australian’s have a number of choices when it comes to investing in different investment structures. Here’s a quick comparison table showing how insurance bonds, superannuation, and managed funds stack up in key areas for Australian investors:

Comparison of Investment Options in Australia

FeatureInsurance BondsSuperannuationManaged Funds (Outside Super)
Tax Rate on Earnings30% (fixed company rate)Up to 15% in accumulation phase; 0% in pension phaseMarginal tax rate (0–47%), CGT may apply
Tax ReportingNot required annually (if rules followed)Complex; depends on phase and fundRequired annually
Access to FundsAnytime (may be penalised if early)Restricted until preservation ageAnytime (subject to tax implications)
Ideal Time Horizon10+ yearsLong-term retirement savingsAny duration, flexible
CGT on Asset SwitchesNoNoYes
Estate Planning BenefitsDirect tax-free payout to beneficiaryCan be nominated to dependents (tax treatment varies)Subject to will and probate
Investment FlexibilityModerate (depends on bond issuer’s options)Broad, depending on fund or SMSFHigh – access to broad range of assets
Contribution Rules125% rule per year (to keep tax-free status)Complex: caps, age limits, work tests applyNo specific limits
FeesCan be high, less transparentOften low (esp. industry funds); SMSF costs varyVaries – some low-cost, others higher
Best ForHigh-income earners wanting tax-effective saving outside superRetirement saving with tax concessionsInvestors seeking flexibility and liquidity

Summary:

  • Insurance Bonds: Good for high-income earners who’ve maxed out super and want simplified, tax-effective long-term investment with estate planning perks.
  • Superannuation: Best for retirement saving due to tax concessions and compounding over decades.
  • Managed Funds: Flexible and accessible, suitable for medium to long-term goals but with greater tax admin and variability.